User:GreysonZed/Desolation Sound Marine Provincial Park/Mr.Mictlantecuhtli Peer Review

The lead is very complete with lots of relevant information. However, it is a bit wordy and could convey the same amount of information with half the words. The park history section is very concise and to the point. However, there is some confusing wording. I'm very impressed with the amount of information included in the First Nations section. The subheadings organize the information efficiently so that one can find exactly what they are looking for with ease. The park ecology section is very clear and concise, however, I would replace the sub-headings "wildlife" and "plant life" with "fauna" and "flora" respectively as the term "wildlife" encapsulates both plants and animals. As for the policy management section, the dashes and all-caps on the subheadings should be removed so that it is consistent with both the rest of the article and all other articles in Wikipedia. The controversies section is fine, but it could probably be expanded. Overall a great article.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)