User:Grm wnr/motd/Archive

This is an archive of User:grm_wnr/motd, and is updated when entries are removed. Date is noted below the entries.

"Honestly, I don't see how putting a couple of userboxes on one's user page transforms the average Wikipedian into some drooling, lamer noob who uses Wikipedia only to hang with his bro's & to pick fights with his unkewl rivals." - Geoff Burling, on wikiEN-l

Last updated: 13:28, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

''LOL the user was first blocked for a duration of $2 Is this what things have come to? admins askng for 2 dollar bribes? lol'' &mdash; User:64.12.116.5 on WP:ANI

Last updated: 08:29, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Strong Support Let's just clone 15-20 Mindspillages and end this election now. &mdash; karmafist on the ArbCom vote

Last updated: 19:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

 A\S\L: Please don't lynch negros, it violates WP:CIVILITY I think. &mdash; Chairboy on #wikipedia

Last updated: 02:50, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

HA! HA! I'M USING SPECIAL:CHECKUSER! &mdash; silsor on #wikipedia

Last updated: 02:11, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

>> I was referring to IRA, not WP:IAR. I was attempting levity.

>> I shan't try again...

Well the IRA do have a long history of ignoreing policy.

- Sam Korn and geni on WikiEN-l

Last updated: 15:55, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

"Policy" shouldn't really concern itself with server load except in the most extreme of cases; keeping things tuned to provide what the user base needs is our job. - Brion on WP:VPT

Last updated: 04:28, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

In the article, when it says some of the info is gleaned from "research performed by the player on organs found on various enemies", it means from the Research skill/function in the game, not Original Research. - Drat on Talk:The Many (System Shock 2)

Last updated: 12:10, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

-->''I intentionally typed this message in caps to highlight this on the AfD, since I've noticed more and more of this retarded "OHNOES NO CONSENSUS === KEEP SO FUCK OFF YOU DELETIONIST REDIRECTORS" occurring in the wake of no consensus AfDs. Apparently the message didn't get through: AFD HAS ZERO BEARING ON THE CONDITION OF THE ARTICLE NOW. IT'S OVER. IN THE PAST. IRRELEVANT. FORM CONSENSUS BASED ON DISCUSSION NOW, NOT A DISCUSSION OF TWO DAYS AGO.'' - Johnleemk on WP:ANI

Last updated: 11:52, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

> 2) What is this "freedom of the press" thing you refer to?

Freedom to press the revert button? - The Epopt vs. Luigi30 on WikiEN-l

Last updated: 14:22, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Last updated: 09:52, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Britannica may rule the waves, but Wikipedia waives the rules! - dbpsmith on wikiEN-l

Last updated: 23:48, 10 February 2006 (UTC)