User:Gsalaz6/sandbox

Article evaluation
Everything in the article is relevant to the main focus of the article. The article had a smooth flow, never did I get distracted.

The Pilsen wellness center article is neutral, and I did not encounter any points where I thought those points were biased.

The article uses different points of view to display their picture. The links in the reference work and they do relate to the topic. The citations and their sources do maintain a neutral tone of voice. The sources are seen as credible. Pictures could be added and more information about the topic can also be added. The talk page of the article is in conflict about information that one user want to add but the other user keeps deleting it because it is of a poor source. The article has not been rated yet. It differs in the ways that it could use some pictures and more information about achievements and more detailed paragraphs.