User:Gsch23/Narrative therapy/Srivera6 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

gsch23


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gsch23/Narrative_therapy?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Narrative therapy

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I think one area in which your article could use some work is in the lead. The original lead paragraph does a great job of summarizing narrative therapy, but it does not do as good a job at introducing what will be coming in the body of the article. Also, there are certain subtopics, like therapeutic documents that could use a lot more information! Lastly, I think the history section could use some work. You can probably delve more into the development of narrative therapy. You could even talk a little bit about how each of the people mentioned influenced the therapy.

Some of the references that are used in the article are a little out dated. I would check if you can find more recent sources that back up these claims. If not, maybe the information they offer is also outdated and needs to be deleted!!