User:Gschoner/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Ban Non Wat

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I am evaluating the article for the archaeological site of Ban Non Wat. This was one of the sites that appealed to me because of its large number of burials. I have taken quite a few biological anthropology classes that have discussed skeletal remains so I was excited to be able to apply that new knowledge to an archaeological context.

Evaluate the article
The article for Ban Non Wat is rated as a stub-class article. It is very short and lacking a broad view of the site. The content itself is only two paragraphs long. The first paragraph discusses what the site looks like and the second discusses the work of Charles Higham and the iron age. When looking at the sources used the author only references Charles Higham. While Higham is one of the leading archaeologists of the site, looking for other sources with similar information might be more beneficial to the page and further add to the credibility. The information itself is presented in a professional tone that remains neutral and informative. There is one picture and one map for the whole article and additional media would be beneficial. It is a good base for an article, but it needs additional information from multiple different sources in order to be more credible and informative.