User:Gschultz1980/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Boreal ecosystem

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I have chosen to edit this article as this is ecosystem type is familiar to me but is not something I work directly with or have any ties to that would give me a bias. This ecosystem is very important due to the variance of succession it experiences and its location in subarctic regions where climate change has a disproportionate impact. My preliminary impression of this article is that it not written very strongly. The grammar, syntax and overall sentence structure needs improvement so that the reader doesn't have to work to connect the ideas. The article also has a decent amount of information that is related but not necessarily relevant for understanding this topic.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section Evaluation: The lead needs more information as it is vague and non descript. There is an overall lack of information for: composition of ecosystem including organisms and abiotic material, weather, climate, and human interactions.