User:Gsd7/Cap Tourmente National Wildlife Area/RandomREM Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Gsd7, Cylee07, and M01090


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gsd7/Cap_Tourmente_National_Wildlife_Area?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Cap Tourmente National Wildlife Area

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The Lead or first paragraph is unedited and I am not sure if it needs to be with the information you have added.

Your references seem credible and match the information that has been added with links included also working properly.

Helpful information such as the location coordinates, various species that reside there, expanding the history of the creation of the area, and the threats towards species in the area face are greatly useful for the editing of the article.

There does not appear to be any noticeable bias of information or intent to sway opinions in the added information either.

Your Grammar and Punctuation appear solid from the added information.

The main improvement I would recommend is the expansion upon the added content to facilitate the requirements for the assignment. There does not appear to be at least 3 paragraphs of additional content compared to the original article and certain information such as the species specifically listed and the threats they face would be preferable.

Examples of improvements would be:

Why are these species listed specifically over the hundreds of others?

Expansion over the species endangered and why the region is important to their continued survival?

Further explanation over threats to these species over the land/habitats they occupy and the individuals of the species themselves.

Reaching the required number of topics (5) specified for the Wikipedia Article project as you have only discussed the endemic and other species of the region (2 topics), the amount of visitors and what they do there, potentially how/why the site was created, and potentially whether the goals that led to the areas creation are met. (potentially for the last 2 points as the information to show those are limited)

Inclusion of links to other existing Wikipedia articles such as locations, organizations, and animal/plant species to enhance the accessibility of your article to further information not applicable for your article.

Adding sources to your paragraphs that correlate to your references,

etc.

These are some key improvements to both make the article better and match the requirements to the assignment in a more complete way.