User:Gsonnenf/wqadraft


 * Comment I've reviewed the ANIs and RFCs and other content. It appears Langus is making a good faith effort to include more specific and accurate information regarding the subject. In the RfC, it appears most editors support some sort of change to the lead. Authors did not agree on what that change should be. Langus's attempt to build consensus for a specific change is valid. In the 2nd ANI, it appears his position had the support of authors and it was not ruled frivolous.
 * In regards to the following accusation, Langus edited the page for the first time March 4. Wee Curry edited for the first time March 5th. How ever you got there, most authors would not consider 5 edits on two occasions extensive editing.
 * After looking at the current evidence, I believe Wee Curry Monsters statements seem to misrepresent the presented situation and be a bit dramatized. Overall, I would suggest not calling Langus's RfC or 2nd ANI disruptive or frivolous, as they do not appear so. Also, toning down the combative or dramatic posts a notch or two would be productive. Even if your right, it's still WP:DICK. If you have evidence Langus is engaged in uncivil behavior, we'll be sure review it and do what we can to curb any inappropriate actions as well.Gsonnenf (talk) 16:31, 9 March 2012 (UTC)