User:Guadgamero/Clitoral erection/Aroddy1 Peer Review

Peer review - General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Guadgamero


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Clitoral erection - sandbox
 * Link to the current version of the article:
 * Clitoral erection - live page

Peer review - Feedback
Feedback Peer Review for Clitoral Erection by aroddy1:

Overview:

I think that you have a good start on adding content to this page. Looking at the live page, there isn't any more information past "physiology", and I think there could be a lot more information added about this subject. I like your addition of "medical conditions" and "non-humans" topics.

Specifics:

I believe the start of information that you've added to the page is good. The medical conditions portion is a great addition, and I think there is alot of content that you could touch on it that part. The "non-human" portion is again another good addition, as it touches on the similarities and differences between humans and animals.

Suggestions:

Firstly I think you're headed in the right direction. :-) as for some quick suggestions, firstly I would add more content to the two sections that you added. For the 'medical conditions' part I found some an interesting meta-analysis linked here that explores and reviews studies of 'sexual dysfunction' in women with hypertension. It could be an interesting topic to explore. I think with the topic of clitoral erection sexual dysfunction is free game since the two are interlocked, i.e, clitoral erection is a direct cause of getting turned on/ sexual activity. Another topic that you could add would be clitoral stimulation/ or more specifics on how clitoral erection is tied to sexual activity.

Closing:

Overall, I think you have a solid start and I'm excited to see what else you add! GOOD WORK! :-D