User:Guancong lance li/Chinese Dama/Shuyanz Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Guancong lance li and Ace dai


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Guancong%20lance%20li/Chinese_Dama?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template and email


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Chinese dama

Evaluate the drafted
Lead


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? -The article has been updated. The content of the article has been added some new content about Chinese dama.but the lead do not in there.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? -There's a little bit about the whole thing in the introduction section. But more can be added.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? -No, the introductory section contains do not have some of the main text introductions. But there is less content.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? -It can added some parts that are not in the article. The additions are about the extension of the book.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? -No
 * Content


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? -The additions are thematic, but more about the chengzi hong le novel. Some updates should be added as appropriate.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? -Some of the additions are up to date. For example, China actively participates in some social welfare activities and performances. This is a relatively new event.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? -No, there isn't have content that is missing or content that does not belong
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps?Yes, they added some content that was missing from the wikipedia. They add something new to the story of Chinese dama society.

Tone and Balance


 * Is the content added neutral? -Their content is neutral. In introducing the author's book. They used neutral language to introduce women under feudal thought. They presented the content from a neutral perspective.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? -No,there aren't in any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? -No, theredon't have some viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented.
 * Does the content add to attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? -No,the content add to attempt not to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another.

Sources and References


 * Is all-new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? -The new content is linked to. Or you can add some more reliable books. Because it uses more of the content of the web.
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? yes,the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? -Not particularly complete. There are still things you can add.
 * Are the sources current? -Yes, the sources is current.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? yes, the sources are written by a diverse spectrum of authors.
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.) -More use of some content from the web and movies. I suggest maybe adding some more reliable books. Such as academic articles and research. Because it uses more of the content of the web.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? - Yes, the link can work.

Organization


 * Is the content added well-written? -The content is well written. Because they give more new ideas. And they give examples of women in different eras. Therefore, this can make readers better understand about Chinese dama.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? -Grammar is rarely error-free. The tenses of some verbs can be changed.


 * Is the content added well-organized?-The additions are concentrated in two sections. One is the image of women in feudal times. The other is the part about Chinese dama. He introduced two directions. Or you can add more parts.

Images and Media

There isn't have any image or media added to this article. If adding images or media could help your article more better.

Overall impressions


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?/How can the content added be improved? -The addition makes the whole article more complete. For example, he introduced more content of Chinese dama's active participation in life. This part can show more different aspects of Chinese dama. It can make readers more clearly understand the changes of Chinese dama.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?-The added content can have a clear contrast. You can see that in different eras. The constant change and development of Chinese dama. It also shows the constant change of society. Women's rights are constantly changing, the different ways women live their lives.
 * How can the content added be improved? -Additions can give more direction for change. Because what's added is some point of view from different eras. So, can say in detail is how to develop and change constantly. I think it will be better.