User:GunnarLacher/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Computer engineering

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This article matters to me, because this is what I plan on doing for the rest of my life. I'm going to be studying Computer Engineering, so it will be good to read more about it and correctly evaluate this article.

Evaluate the article
Lead - The article has a solid opening sentence that describes what Computer Engineering is. The lead shows all the topics that will be discussed in the article. Everything that is mentioned in the lead is also included and elaborated on in the article. The lead is also an excellent example of how you can explain a lot of information in a small amount of words.

Content - The article's content is related to the article. The content is significantly up-to-date and even mentions statistics for the year 2031. All the content that is mentioned in the article is helpful and none of it is useless. This article doesn't mention any underrepresented populations or topics.

Tone and Balance - Yes the article is neutral, it isn't one-sided. There aren't any biased topics. there weren't any underrepresented or overrepresented viewpoints. There aren't any minority or fringe viewpoints in this article. The article doesn't try to persuade the reader in any direction.

Sources and References - The article is backed by reliable secondary sources. The sources are thorough, but they are a little outdated the latest sources being from 2004 and the earliest sources being from 2020. The sources are by a diverse group of people and organizations. There are better and more up-to-date sources that could better contribute to the document. Some of the older links are not working, but the earlier links do work.

Organizations and writing quality - The article is well written, you can clearly understand what is trying to be said. From what I would tell the article doesn't have any spelling and grammatical errors. This article does a good job of breaking up the different topics and sections that it discussed.

Images and Media - The article does have images that enhance the understanding of the article. The images are well captioned, they tell exactly what the images are showing. The images do need the Wikipedia copyright regulations, and the way that the images are displayed is visual pleasing.

Talk page discussion - The conversations and topics that are being discussed are about, if there are enough engineering associations mentioned in the text, and the typical job that a Computer Engineer gets. This article is classified as a level-5 vital article. There is no different because we haven't talked about Computer Engineering in this class.

Overall Impressions - The overall rating I'd give this article is a 8/10. The strength of this article is good, but I can get stronger. This article can be expanded upon and certain topics can be more descript. I personally think that the article is well-developed, but somethings can be fixed and improved.