User:GunnarLacher/User:GunnarLacher/sandbox/Craig lane5 Peer Review

(provide username)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:GunnarLacher/sandboxLink to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead in-

I believe your details and evidence are very good you have some strong points and great information overall.When you said Computer Hardware Engineer – $115,080, Aerospace Engineer – $109,650, Nuclear Engineer – $102,220 this gave very descriptive detail that helped the reader better understand what you're talking about.I would at one more cite because the minimum she said to have was 10 and I would also give your article more titles instead of just having Benefits and Skills Needed For An Engineering Degree.I believe this would help the reader visually and help not be more visually pleasing.I plan on adding more statistics and facts so that the reader has more background information.

Article Lead section-

I feel that I can tell fully about your topic and you gave great details about it too.I believe all your informations flows very well with your article.I think you're not missing very much on your topic and evidence you have great info with a interesting topic.

Structure-

I believe this is the only thing you really need to fix I would just split your topics up so its not a big run on off information and is split up so its better looking to the reader.I believe you have enough information you just need to split it up so that the reader doesn't get confused or lost about your topic.I don't think you're missing any viewpoints u provided different writers with different opinions and evidence.I believe it has a stronger viewpoint that its harder to be a engineer.

Neutral content-

I believe I can tell that you are strongly believed that engineering is a very hard thing to do and I couldn't agree more.There are no words that don't feel neutral.You have some claims on behalf of unnamed groups I think you could add the author or writers name from when you cite your evidence so the reader better understands where this information came from and so you can give them there credit for there information.I believe it talks more about negative things like how hard the work and everything is

Reliable sources-

You clearly cited all your evidence all I would add is another cite so that you have 10 things cited instead of 9 of them.I believe yours cite are evenly balanced out and this make the article flow better.I think all your statements clearly are described and talked about in your cites.

Review reflection-

I plan to add more statistics and evidence to my writing

I plan to add more cites to my article

I plan to add more information about my writing