User:Guru.0987/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link) Polyandry in India
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. - I choose this article because it give me information ancient culture also i can learned about my country how people where getting married in their on family where now it does not happen.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? - Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? - yes some information is related to it and need to find more resources of it.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? - yes it include in the kinnaur content where more information has to been and research. It’s said that mostly marriage where the thing where they had to continue what their ancestor where doing . But now days the things are getting better and people in village are very the broad minded where they think the society is changes so all they ritual like women having two husbands are getting off.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? - its related what I am researching for.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? - yes it is relevant to topic
 * Is the content up-to-date? - yes but did some preliminary research.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? There is content which I am going to work is kinnaur where they’re are missing information and need citations source . As my search there is much more going in the ancient time when the polyandry in India at the kinnaur typically like married where they has to follow their ritual and a women has more than two husband.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? - its is related one of topic in wikipedia gaps and needs more research.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? it is kind of very informative its tells about ancient culture.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? - their are no heavy claims but really informative and needs more research because in Wikipedia they haven't been clear about it.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? its under represent and need more work and information in Wikipedia.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? it depends on the reader how they read it and how they think how was ancient culture was followed.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - yes it is, more facts are from the cited paper and book. Some others I heard from my friend who is from that state itself.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? - yes per the finding the sources are very informative but need more research to be thorough.
 * Are the sources current? sources are not current as per the research.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? - cannot really tell
 * Check a few links. Do they work? yes some of does have y article related information.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? its easy to read.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? article is lack informative does not much information so cannot really see the grammatical or spelling errors.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes ts well organized but need some missing information to fill the gaps.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? its just included one image.
 * Are images well-captioned? yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? yes it does.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? yes it does laid out in visually appealing way.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? - I have not reached yet to that point.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? I do not know how to check the article if its rated o not.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? no I think its related to indian culture and its very informative and very interesting to know about culture and traditional.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? - just started the research on the particular article which I have choose.
 * What are the article's strengths? - Article Strength are information on its content is very detailed and very informative.
 * How can the article be improved? - Article can been improved through doing research and compare the article with one another through reliable resource which represent correct information about polyandry in India.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? the article in Wikipedia  having lack information, i would says its underdeveloped

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: ~