User:GustavoCalva/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
AM (Arctic Monkeys album)

Talk:AM (Arctic Monkeys album)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I am writing about this aritcle about the band "Artic Monkeys" and their album "AM" because I recently went to one of their concerts where they played some of the songs from this specific album.

Evaluate the article
When evaluating the content of the article I found it to be true to the expectations of Wiki because it provides accurate information in a concise and non-bias approach, with a lot of citation for the important aspects of the article. I found the leading section to be well written with a good overarching summary of the contents of the article. In addition, I found the tone and balance to be informant with varying sources and a neutral tone. The contents itself provide a quick history and background on the contents of the Album, all being accurate and descriptive. The addition of pictures of reviews and cover art made it seem a lot more fleshed out and that it had been worked on with efficency. The writing quality itself is simple and concise which fits the theme of the article as it is merely showing an overview of the article itself. It does not need overlycomplicated text to get the information out and the writing is simple for any reader to understand the article. I will say that there is a lot of information but it is presented in a way that does not clutter the site and is divided by relevant sections if a reader wished to look at one specific area of the album. The talk page discussion is short in the suggestions and edits I see but it seems like it has a clear but non-active talk page of how to improve the article itself. It does have very little content but it seems that it is due to the fact that everything else in this article is accurate and has already a lot of information that new information isn't required. The overall impression I had of the article is that it does what any wikipedia article should do, provide factual information with a lot of ciation and detail without being implicilty bias in presenting the facts. It also has good sections that make it feel like a good wiki article.