User:Gxdess/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Wild Seed (novel)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it is relevant to the topic I am currently studying. Upon my first impression, this article looked thorough and the citations looked valid.

Evaluate the article
The article thoroughly covers all content related to Wild Seed. The lead section is concise but too short to cover all the content discussed in the article. I detected a tone of bias in the article, specifically towards Doro's "body snatching" abilities. There was also a heavily opinionated statement about the character Thomas, stating that he was a "a sickly, drunken, angry, sullen psionic who lives a hermit's life in the woods". Other than that, the article's content was valid and included the historical aspects associated with the reading. All sources and references are valid; the links to all of them work properly. The article as a whole was organized well and easy to read. It only included one picture, which was the cover of the book. There were several important quotes scattered throughout the article, but it still could have been more visually appealing. The conversations on the article's talk page mainly consisted of how the author can incorporate more of the historical aspects of the reading into the article. There were also several recommendations to include external links and secondary sources. This article is connected to three WikiProjects: novels, women writers, and science fiction. Overall, the article could use some improvement. Its strength was the amount of information it covered, and its weakness was the amount of biased opinions towards the books characters.