User:Gyc6836/Ellen DeGeneres/Maggie.rodriguez28 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Gyc6836
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Gyc6836/Ellen DeGeneres

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Kinda, needs more of an overview of the article.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No. It does talk about her shows though.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is very short.

Lead evaluation
I think it would be good if you added more information on what is to follow in the article. I bet you (like me) have been so caught up in COVID-19 that this just has not been a priority so I completely get it. I would just keep adding more to the article as much as you can. I know I am in the same boat as you.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I think there just needs to be more information overall.

Content evaluation
The article does already have a vast amount of information in it. So, maybe try writing an introduction of what is to come in the article.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Most of it. I feel like many of the LGBTQ+ community do love her but, not everyone may.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? You are very much in favor of her and it shows in the tone. (don't worry I am in favor of her too)
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? View= positive
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? "She is very well known and loved in the LGBTQ community."

Tone and balance evaluation
You're doing great. Just make sure the tone is more neutral.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? No.
 * Are the sources current? Yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.

Sources and references evaluation
Make sure you add your citations!

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? It is easy to read, yes.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Sort of...

Organization evaluation
Just keep adding more information!

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Sort of

Images and media evaluation
It isn't her best picture but it does show her clearly!

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? n/a
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? n/a
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? n/a
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? n/a

New Article Evaluation
n/a

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? There needs to be more content but, as I said, I do believe with everything happening right now, it is hard for us students to prioritize this. I know I am having difficulties and I need to add so much more to my article, so don't worry!
 * What are the strengths of the content added? There is a picture that helps show who Ellen is and there are different links to click on.
 * How can the content added be improved? Just keep adding!

Overall evaluation
I think you are on the right path, just keep adding! :)