User:Gymshark4321/Discrimination based on skin color/Studenteditor03 Peer Review

General info
Gymshark4321
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Gymshark4321/Discrimination based on skin color
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Discrimination based on skin color

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

It doesn't look as though the individual editing made any changes to the lead section. It does a great job overviewing what the whole article discuss, which makes it easy forename as a reader. The article gives background on what discirmation against skin color is and looks like in society. It also gives a clear description of the subsections being talked about, for example,  justice, business, economics, health care, etc. It also references how it will work to compare and contrast these topics in different continents over the world.

Content:

Based on the Talk page and looking through the information, the added information is very relevant to the topic. When reading through the article, there is a good understanding of the overall topic, which comes from the sources sighted. There are still some paragraphs that need to have sources added, which this editor is working to help contribute. All the information being added has good content to the article, which makes it easier to read. I would just make sure that the sources are relevant, adding new and up to date sources. Especially, in recent years, there should be better statistics.

Tone/Balance:

From reading the article, the author as well as any contributions made to the text were neutral. they worked to add quantitative information, which makes being raised difficult. The sources pull up extensive studies that back the claim without needing to add personal opinion. The article is a good way of getting information that can be then used to formulate ones own opinion on the subject.

Sources and References:

The editor of this article chose to research and add citations where they were missing. The first source of was educational report published in 2000. although it provides good knowledge, specially on the point of gifted programs, he article is outdated. I would suggest looking for an article that is with in he past 5-6 years to get the most accurate description of today's statistics and policies. The second source, once again adds great context to child stereotyping from a peer-review journal. However, it is from 2004, which creates a gap of possible correlation of the information provided. The third source is a peer reviewed publication. It offers a different take on the idea, brining up wealth and the gap those of color face. This was published more recently meaning it would be okay to include as a citation. Finally, the last source is a peer-reviewed second hand source that is about the heirchry based on race. This is the most relevant article, published in 2020. It provides goos depth on the topic and offers good insight. I would recommend looking into more relevant sources.

Organization:

The article is very organized. It starts by offering the lead, or the overview of what will be read. It offers a small section regarding worldwide views on discrimination based on color. It then breaks down all the different continents, Asia, Africa, South America, Europe, and finally emphasis on the United States. From there, the subsections that were mentioned in the lead, justice, business, economics, health care, etc. This made reading the article easy, especially needing to follow along with a large variety of information.

Images and Media:

In this article, there are very little images. There is not one particular section that the editor is contributing, so overall there isn't any particular image I would include. The two images included, one referencing the social structure of India and the other showing a Black Lives Matter Protest, are an okay addition. The only one that really helps understand the article better is the one referencing Indias class structure. The Black Lives Matter image has no context underneath of it, although important when discussing disparities with in the United States.