User:Gzora1/Truman Doctrine/WIKI20220 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Gzora1


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gzora1/Truman_Doctrine?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Truman Doctrine

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The lead appears to be well put together, however I would suggest adding a little more substance to it. Some of the broad overview of the legislation is given. Although additional information would be fantastic, adding too many might turn the lead into a summary. I'd recommend adding somewhere towards the beginning that this became recognized as the Truman Doctrine, in its current form.

Historical Background

This section is outstanding due to the historical context you have presented, such as the political states of Turkey and Greece, as well as the Truman Doctrine. I suggest that you include how the Truman Doctrine was the finest probable decision of law to be adopted. This would validate the Truman Doctrine's efficacy and clarify why it was worked towards becoming law.

Legislative history

The legislative history you provided in this section of your article has enough knowledge on the legislation. I would recommend putting the provisions of your law in this section in your own words, with adequate citation. This makes the article more legible than just reciting the provisions in this section. The inclusion of sources in this section would be useful since it would provide credibility to the section. If there are not many provisions to state clearly in this section, perhaps simply highlighting any disagreement or an individual who voted against the legislation and why might be informative.

It seems that the information you have put together seems to structure your article well, with slight improvements it can be even better. I would possibly advise adding a little more detail to the lead and a few more sources to make your article better.