User:H2lam/Ageism/Vshu43 Peer Review

General info
H2lam
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:H2lam/Ageism
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Ageism

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: The lead of the article effectively sets the stage for discussions around ageism. The inclusion of how different countries, like the United States and the Philippines, respond to ageism adds a global perspective, broadening the context.

Content: The added content is relevant and informative, expanding on the discrimination faced by older workers. It appropriately discusses stereotypes and challenges faced by older employees, including forced retirement due to discrimination.

Tone: The tone is generally neutral. It presents facts and legal information without overt bias.

Sources: The content is adequately supported by sources, referencing laws such as the ADEA in the US and the UK's anti-discrimination legislation.

Organization: The content is well-written with no apparent grammatical or spelling errors.

Media: No images or media added in the draft