User:H3lic0pter44/Yiddishist movement/Phillyfan27 Peer Review

General info
H3licopter44
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:H3lic0pter44/Yiddishist movement
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Yiddishist movement :

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead


 * there were no edits made to the lead section which is totally fine, I think the lead reads pretty clearly already
 * it is short though, you could add 1-2 sentences summarizing/highlighting the sections in the rest of the article?
 * the intro sentence works well/is clear, no need to change that

Content


 * I really like the re-organization of the article body sections and the creations of new sections
 * especially 1st paragraph added under 19th century origins
 * Czernowitz Conference section has good additions in the middle of the paragraph but doesn't seem to have a citation after the new info is added -- maybe I missed it? But could use a citation here
 * addition of Contemporary Yiddishism really useful way to wrap up the article

Tone and Balance


 * stayed relatively neutral
 * one viewpoint missing is how Zionists viewed Yiddishism... could add a small section on its own or under further develoments discussing how Zionists were against Yiddishism and why

Sources and References


 * wide range of sources used
 * good combination of newer/older sources, ranged from 1952-2023
 * sources seemed to be used well, added good detail/context for the information already in the article
 * a few areas where information was added that could be referenced and hasn't been yet

Organization


 * the strongest part of this draft is how you reorganzied the article! It's really impressive and flows really nicely!
 * "history" can be a really broad section name and I like that you changed this to 19th Century Origins (more interesting)

Overall Impressions


 * this is a really strong draft -- there's a ton of new information added that elevates the content while staying neutral
 * my main comments are be wary of citing new information where it's added and consider adding Zionist perspective on Yiddishism because they seem to have had strong opinions about it/could be worth mentioning to balance out different perspectives. Good work!!