User:H3lic0pter44/Yiddishist movement/TartCherrySourGrape Peer Review

General info
H3lic0pter44
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:H3lic0pter44/Yiddishist movement
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Yiddishist movement

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

-The Lead section is strong and remains unchanged from the original article.

Content:

- The content added is highly relevant to the topic of Yiddishism and covers its historical development, key events, and contemporary relevance.

- The article addresses a topic related to historically underrepresented populations (Jewish communities) and explores the cultural and linguistic aspects of their history.

- The content added, enriched the current information without fully overwriting what was already availble in the article

Tone and Balance:

- The content does not appear to persuade readers toward a specific viewpoint but rather informs about the history and significance of Yiddishism.

- There were many points where you made the wording more concsice and I think that improved the readability of the article.

- There was a lot of content added, which added a lot of perspective to not the movement but how it was utilized by different populations

Sources and References:

- The first link in references, throws an error

- I would unlink the ISSN in reference 4, it take you to the wrong page

- Number 7 isn't quite cited right

Organization:

I might add more headings and use some of your current headings as subheadings, keeping overarching ones like history and yiddish movement in the US, etc.

-I assume that is is just a product of working in the sandbox, but I would keep the History header, and then put "19th century origins" as a sub-header of that category.

- I would hyper link, "maskilim" if there is one-

- The references aren't alphabetized

Images and Media:

There are no pictures in your sandbox, but one picture with the caption on the article. If you can find them, another picture may be useful, espiecially since your article is longer

Overall Impressions:

- Strengths include thorough research, clear organization, and neutrality of tone.

- To further improve the article, consider updating sources to ensure the most current scholarship is included and diversifying the authorship of cited works.