User:HL02378/Tributyltin/TrevorDriggers Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing

HL02378


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:HL02378/Tributyltin/Bibliography?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_bibliography Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Hunter's lead reflects what he wants adjusted very well. It has an introductory sentence on what tributyltin is, and how it is used in the environment, and how it also affects the environment. The lead is very concise and leads up to what he wants to address. The draft is equally represented in what Hunter wanted to address as well. All content was evenly distributed.

All of the content added is relevant to the topic and is up to date. The article does not have any equity gaps either. All of the content added is neutral, and has no bias towards either side of the argument meaning no favoritism being shown towards manufacturing companies or environmental safety programs. All information is concise and informative.

All content provided is backed with numerous pieces of evidence. All sources function properly, and are formatted correctly for the wikipedia website. The sources also come from a wide range of authors with plenty of experience in the science field surrounding tributyltin.

The content added is very well organized, and has very small spelling errors if any. From beginning to end, this article is very well-written. Hunter's had no photos added in this draft.