User:HLStewart2000/Pack rat/BioWiki4155 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * 1) The first sentence is strong. It clearly explains the importance of diet for the organism.
 * 2) The second citation has an error that needs to be manually corrected. This would make the addition more visually appealing, and would make the source look more reliable
 * 3) The second sentence should be re-worded, as it is very similar what is stated in the source.
 * 4) This is not applicable to my topic.
 * 5) The information is appropriately placed. The “Diet” section in this Wikipedia article needs to be further developed, and this contribution does that.
 * 6) The length is appropriate. No portion of the contribution is unnecessary or off-topic.
 * 7) The contribution is unbiased.
 * 8) The language is neutral.
 * 9) The sources are from academic journals.
 * 10) Two sources were used, as the assignment called for.
 * 11) There are no unsourced statements. The claims in both sentences are supported by the sources.