User:HMSAudacious/Alpha 66/Gorditagirl21 Peer Review

General info

 * User:HMSAudacious
 * Alpha 66

Lead

 * The lead has not been changed, the main part that has been changed has been the expansion of the history section.

Content

 * The content added has been a huge improvement to the article. There has been clear expansion of the article through the history section. Before, this section was very small and did not have much to any information on what this group looked like in the Untied States or the other groups that formed after a break off from Alpha 66.

Tone and Balance

 * The content added sounds neutral and there do not appear to have any heavy bias towards a position, there is just information presented. It does not seem that there are any viewpoints over or under represented, there is definitely more information presented that adds a more well rounded tone and a better well rounded article. There does not seem to be any persuading done with the new added information.

Sources and References

 * All the new references cite the new information and the sources themselves seem credible since they are from JSTOR.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * The content added is well-written, it is concise, straight to the point, clear, and easy to understand. There was one grammar mistake that I fixed.

Guiding questions:


 * The content added has definitely been an improvement and the overall quality of the article has gotten better. The article is more well rounded and more complete. The strengths of the content added are that it made the overall article better and it seems well researched. There can be more in-depth content added with a little more research, but it feels that there is limited research done on this topic.