User:Habap/Sandbox

Interesting interpretation of NPOV
I was checking for what other sources had been contributed by Communicat and rejected by the 'Old Guard' and found an interesting quote from him: "...please don't pervert the rule of NPOV as defined in Wiki’s own policy guidelines, i.e. NPOV 'is not a lack of viewpoint, but is rather a specific, editorially neutral, point of view.'" Here's the diff that includes that quote.

Linkspam: Psychological torture

Refs
References that support Winer's theories: "See Vladimir Petrov (ed.), Soviet Historians and the German Invasion, Columbia: University of South Carolina Press 1968, p.286; Y Larionov, N Yeronin, B Solovyov, V. Timokhovich, World War II Decisive Battles of the Soviet Army, Moscow: Progress 1984; Gar Alperovitz, 'How Did the Cold War Begin?' in Walter LaFeber (ed.) The Origins of the Cold War 1941-1947, New York: John Wiley 1971; DF Fleming, The Cold War and Its Origins: 1917-1960, New York: Random 1961' Wilfred Burchett, Shadow of Hiroshima, London: Verso 1983."

Aftermath Lead
The aftermath of World War II introduced a new era of tensions arising from opposing ideologies, mutual distrust, and a nuclear arms race between East and West, together with a radically altered international correlation of forces. There were post-war boundary disputes in Europe and elsewhere, and questions of national self determination in Poland and in European colonial territories abroad.

Immediately after the war, the physical devastation of the warring countries left millions homeless and economies in tatters. Populations were displaced by the re-drawing of national borders.

The occupying troops of the Allies

Immediate effects, post-war tension, United Nations and economics