User:HabeshaKid/Christ Community Health Services/MaSoKiPo Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

HabeshaKid


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:HabeshaKid/Christ Community Health Services


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * User:HabeshaKid/Christ Community Health Services

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead is concise and up to date with content and has provided clear and concise information about the relevant topic. The content is also relevant to the topic with updated information to this year. However, the history section is somewhat redundant to the lead. There are no biases listed in the article detected. There are many reliable sources for the topic with current information provided about the topic in the article as evidence to a reliable and updated resource. The content is well-organized in terms of construction and legibility. The strengths of the content are how the important information is emphasized about the history of the topic. Either the history or the lead of the topic needs to be different because they both refer to the same information.