User:HabitsofEelz/Nature writing/Eliseforget Peer Review

General info
HabitsofEelz
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:HabitsofEelz/Nature writing - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Nature writing - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * good job rewriting/reorganizing the information, it makes it flow better and it is easier to read
 * make sure you have sources to back up the lead information though, so we know it is proven
 * as long as you find sources to back up the information, you can keep it
 * if you have time, maybe rearrange the wording/syntax in the 20th century section as well a little more, some of it feels choppy
 * also add more citations even where the [citation needed] is, as some is just from no where
 * citations all look good and links work, all from verifiable sources