User:Hagan2/Antimicrobial resistance/Liviaamurphy444 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Hagan2


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Antimicrobial resistance
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * - Yes, the article also seems well organized with subtopics all relating and coherent.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * - The article appears fairly neutral. Part of pesticides description seemed bias on the negative impacts, yet justifably so.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * - No talks about impact on different demographics, only differentiating between the US and UK.
 * Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * - Yes, although I believe the WHO article is already cited.
 * Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * - No, the UK section only utilizes one citation for the entire section. Section needs more evidence from other sources.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
 * - Everything looks fairly updated, accept the beginning of the US section, focusing on pre-COVID policies.