User:Halcharbonneau/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Prenatal vitamin:
 * Article Evaluation
 * The lead introduces the topic effectively, providing a concise overview of prenatal vitamins, their intended use, and recommendations for women of childbearing age. The lead seems to reflect the most important information, focusing on the purpose, composition, and considerations associated with prenatal vitamins.
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic. It maintains a balanced approach, giving appropriate weight to sections such as the purpose, customizations, side effects, and availability of prenatal vitamins. The article is generally informative but could benefit from more information on prenatal vitamins' potential risks and limitations. The article has minimal redundancy; each section adds valuable information without unnecessary repetition.
 * The sections are well-organized, following a logical sequence that makes sense for the readers. The current organization works well for presenting information. However, moving the section on side effects closer to the introduction might enhance the article's accessibility.
 * The article appears neutral, without conveying a specific perspective or bias, and aims to inform the readers rather than persuade them. The language is mostly neutral, using factual statements without overly opinionated expressions. It does not appear to make strong claims on behalf of any particular group or people.
 * Most claims in the article are connected to a reliable source, but some need citations. For instance, a claim about the use of 5-methyltetrahydrofolate in prescription prenatal vitamins is not supported by a reliable source. In addition, statements are generally attributed to relevant sources, avoiding overreliance on a single source.
 * The article needs to tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects. The examples provided in the article refer to the United States and don't represent a worldview of the subject. It would benefit from a broader international perspective on the use and recommendation of prenatal vitamins.
 * Sources:
 * Sources:

Option 2

 * Anxiolytic:
 * Article Evaluation
 * The lead introduced the topic of anxiolytics and provided a general overview. It is concise and gives a good starting point for readers. It is brief and only covers some aspects in detail. The article's content is relevant to the topic. It is comprehensive, covering various types of anxiety disorders, their clinical assessments, etiology, classification of medications, history, mechanisms of action, and individual drug classes. It is important to note that it's missing the use of other medications, such as antiepileptics for anxiety disorders.
 * The current organization needs to be cleaned up to provide a more logical flow. There do not seem to be any unnecessary sections, but it could benefit from more information to be included in specific subcategories. The article presents the information in a neutral manner. It does not explicitly draw conclusions or advocate for any particular viewpoint, making it difficult to discern the author's perspective. The article's language appears neutral, focusing on presenting factual information without overtly biased terms or phrases.
 * Multiple sources are referred to in the article. The citations are reliable, but only some claims have a citation, and more research is required. The article appears well-structured and informative, covering various aspects of anxiolytics. :
 * Sources:
 * Sources:

Option 3

 * Deprescribing:
 * Article Evaluation
 * The article's lead is clear and concise and appropriately summarizes the key concepts of deprescribing, highlighting its purpose, process, and potential benefits. It emphasizes the importance of reducing medication burden and harm, particularly in populations such as older individuals with chronic medical conditions. The lead does not seem to give undue weight to any specific part of the article.
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic. It could benefit from more information on specific case studies or examples illustrating successful deprescribing strategies. The article has minimal redundancy as each section contributes unique information to the overall understanding of deprescribing. The sections of the article are well-organized, following a logical flow from defining deprescribing to discussing its history, demographics, evidence base, risks, monitoring, resources, and practice changes. Including the section on barriers and enablers adds depth to the discussion.
 * Specific subcategories, such as 'Evidence-based,' are not written in a neutral tone as they claim that deprescribing is beneficial in all cases. The author's perspective on the topic is not explicitly stated but can be guessed by reading the article. It's important to consider editorial bias with statements such as "Most health outcomes remain unchanged as an effect of deprescribing. The absence in a change has been viewed as a positive outcome". This framing can be seen as promoting a specific point of view.
 * The article is connected to several reliable sources but lacks citations for some statements, such as the world's first use of the term "deprescribing." More reliable sources are required to improve its validity. The article only focuses on one demographic for deprescribing (geriatrics) and does not tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. In addition, a pharmacist's role in deprescribing, such as medication optimization and Interprofessional collaboration, could be added to improve this article.
 * Overall, the article provides a comprehensive overview of deprescribing, but addressing the neutrality dispute, providing references for specific claims, and carefully framing statements would enhance its credibility.
 * Sources
 * Gnjidic D, Le Couteur DG, Hilmer SN. Discontinuing drug treatments. BMJ. 2014 Nov 21;349:g7013.
 * Holmes HM. Rational prescribing for patients with a reduced life expectancy. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Jan;85(1):103-7. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2008.211. Epub 2008 Nov 26. Review. PubMed PMID: 1903719
 * O'Mahony, M. S., & Parbhoo, A. (2020). Deprescribing in older people. British journal of hospital medicine (London, England : 2005), 81(1), 1–9. https://doi-org.uml.idm.oclc.org/10.12968/hmed.2019.0213
 * Rochon PA, Gurwitz JH. Optimising drug treatment for elderly people: the prescribing cascade. BMJ. 1997 Oct 25;315(7115):1096-9.
 * Rochon PA, Gurwitz JH. Optimising drug treatment for elderly people: the prescribing cascade. BMJ. 1997 Oct 25;315(7115):1096-9.

Option 4

 * Metered-dose inhaler:
 * Article Evaluation
 * The lead provides a concise overview of a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) and its significance in treating respiratory diseases. However, it lacks specific information on the history and development of the device, which might be relevant for a more comprehensive introduction. The article's content is relevant to the topic. It gives more appropriate weight to the essential components of an MDI, its uses, history, spacers, lifespan, inhaler techniques, propellants, and colour coding. The article lacks information on recent advancements or emerging technologies related to metered-dose inhalers. A section on ongoing research or potential future developments could enhance the article's completeness.
 * Some information, such as the description of the inhaler components, is repeated in the "Uses" section. This information could be consolidated for better flow. The sections are well-organized, follow a logical structure, and move from basic information to more specialized topics. Merging information on spaces with the section on inhaler technique might improve its flow. All of the sections contribute to the understanding of MDIs. However, the article might benefit from a concise summary or conclusion section.
 * The article appears neutral without drawing explicit conclusions or writing for particular viewpoints. It maintains a factual tone throughout, but terms like "fragile and unreliable" describing the squeeze bulb nebulizer could be seen as subjective. The article does not make claims on behalf of specific groups or individuals. It could also include different perspectives from stakeholders, such as patients, healthcare providers, or researchers.
 * Most claims in this article don't have a citation. More reliable sources are required. In addition, more information is needed regarding the environmental impact of MDIs and, more details about spacers and how to choose the correct spacer device.
 * Overall, the article provides a comprehensive understanding of metered-dose inhalers, but improvements in citations, inclusion of recent advancements, and minor organizational adjustments could enhance its quality. :
 * Sources
 * Choosing a Spacer Device for MDIs. Pharmacist’s Letter Sept 2008.
 * Doan Q, Shefrin A, Johnson D. Cost-effectiveness of Metered-Dose Inhalers for Asthma Exacerbations in the Pediatric Emergency Department. Pediatrics 2011 0: peds.2010-2963
 * Newman, S. P. (2004). Spacer devices for metered dose inhalers. Clinical pharmacokinetics, 43(6), 349-360.
 * Sander N et al. Dose counting & the use of pressurized metered-dose inhalers: canisters running on empty. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006 Jul;97(1):34-8.
 * Tips for correct use of Metered-dose Inhalers (MDIs). Pharmacist's Letter June 2007.

Option 5

 * Pharmacy technician:
 * Article Evaluation
 * The lead briefly overviews the topic, introducing pharmacy technicians and their roles. The lead is missing information about pharmacy technicians' global prevalence or importance. The article is well-organized, following a logical structure from the overview to education and training and then specific country-wise information. Sections like "Education and Training" and Requirements by State" are appropriately placed. The sections seem relevant, and there's no apparent redundancy. The sections on different countries provide valuable insight into the global context of their role.
 * The article lacks some statistical information, especially on the global prevalence and demand for pharmacy technicians. The lead mentions the variation in training but does not elaborate on these differences.
 * The article seems neutral and factual, presenting unbiased information. It draws information from various sources, including official health organizations, statistical agencies, and associations. Most statements are supported by references, but some country-specific sections lack citations, such as the content about Nigeria and Sri Lanka. More reliable sources are required to enhance its credibility.
 * Overall, the article provides a good starting point to obtain an overview of pharmacy technicians. Still, improvements could be made in providing more global context, ensuring citations in all sections, and elaborating on the variations in training and roles. :
 * Sources: