User:Haley McDaniel/Keysmash/TheWookieWikster Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) HaleyMcDaniel
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?Yes, it's a new article.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?Yes.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?No.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?No.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?It is concise.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?Yes.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?Yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?No.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?Yes.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?No.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?No.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?Yes.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?Yes, although I'm not sure how reliable Urban Dictionary is.
 * Are the sources current?Yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? It could be a little more clear.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?None that I saw.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?I think History and Usage could be two different sections. They probably have enough information to be. Also, there was no information in the format section, although I feel like it will be added soon.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? The Keysmash example is good and really helped me to understand what was being talked about. I'm not sure how the image of a keyboard is relevant. I do understand it is related to a Keysmash, but it seems unnecessary.
 * Are images well-captioned?The Keysmash example is captioned well, but the keyboard is not captioned.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?Yes.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?I think the keyboard image is awkwardly placed and should be more up front and visible, although you might've been trying to do this anyway and were just rushed.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?Yes, again, I'm not sure how reliable Urban Dictionary is, but it is pretty up to date as far as what internet slang means.
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?It is pretty exhaustive. I do feel there could be more sources, but that could be said with any article.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?Yes.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?Yes.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?Yes.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?I think that it has great examples and illustrations, and the content is unbiased. It is relevant content too.
 * How can the content added be improved?I think the keyboard image could be moved, more sources could be added, I think the wording could be more clear.