User:Haleymck/Psychological resilience/Smalls2023 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Haleymck


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Haleymck/Psychological resilience - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Psychological resilience - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
Haley,

In your sandbox, I see that the first two sentences start out the same. I think it would read better if they were changed up some. Adding reference links to your work would help. This will provide easier access to the reference rather than having to scroll through the article to locate it. After reviewing the article, I feel that the lead section could use more information. This will help grab the reader’s attention and provide more data on the topic chosen. The criticism sections is also in need of more information and references. I also feel that the “Social Support” section could use more information to help build a better idea. The last section I noticed that needed more data was the “Criticism of application” section. I feel as though more information on this would help close out the article. Overall, I think you are on the right path and that most parts of the article provides enough information on the topic and is well written and organized.