User:Halihutch/Integration host factor/Thomasturner1 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?User:Halihutch


 * Link to draft you're reviewing User:Halihutch/Integration host factor - Wikipedia:

Peer review

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, but it never says the words "Integration host factor"
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No sections given

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? I have no idea. What I know about IHF has nothing to do with what they wrote.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? No idea no references.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Needs more

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? No kind of jumbled.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Capital "I" and space in the second sentence. Two spaces in the second sentence. 2 should be two. Itself is one word. Followed not fallowed.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? No

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * What are the strengths of the content added? You have got something down.