User:Handrew2depaul/Chinese Tea Culture/Bcaillouet25 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Handrew2depaul


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Handrew2depaul/Chinese Tea Culture


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Chinese tea culture

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall Impressions


 * The revision is very well written. I honestly thought the edits were the published page. Great work.
 * the content does help flesh out the overall article. Very informative.
 * Peer added quality sources. This page was flagged for using 1 source heavily, so peer is on the right track with well added sources to add to the reputability of the page.
 * The overall tone of the article is neutral and very informative.
 * I would work on balancing out the sections of the article so one section isn't longer and more robust than others. The section on tea nationalism is smaller in comparison to other sections.
 * I will make sure in my own article to be mindful of the tone and not try to be too persuasive in the manner of my writings
 * Overall this was a great start to editing this article.

Lead


 * peer isn't updating that section. from the edits made I am assuming peer is potentially overhauling the entire existing page, but I may be wrong. The table of contents have been updated lending it to be a completely new page

Content


 * Yes the content added is relevant to the topic
 * Yes it is up to date content. Sources from within the past 5 years.
 * Peer did a complete overhaul. As stated above I am unsure if this is an entire overhaul or just a few sections being added.
 * This section was noted by Wikipedia that it needs verified sources. Peer did an excellent job adding verified sources.

Tone & Balance


 * Content that was added is neutral.
 * There is not much bias being read in the writings

Sources & References


 * Yes peer used sources to back up newly added information.
 * Yes peer used the sources correctly
 * Yes the sources are thorough
 * Yes sources are current
 * Sources are only Asian, but considering the subject matter I don't see that being an issue.
 * Sources are peer-reviewed
 * Links do work

Organization


 * content added is well-written, concise and easy to read
 * no grammatical errors/spelling errors
 * the content added is well-organized