User:Handrews.000/sandbox

=headingtitle= Grocery store


 * There are many minor errors in terms of small-level editing, such as capitalization, comma placement, etc.
 * The sections regarding "prices" and "marketing" could perhaps have titles that are more indicative of the overarching topic of grocery stores. Content is also loosely associated with grocery stores. These topics are very broad, and likely already have their own wiki pages, so keeping it concise and relevant to the topic would be beneficial.
 * Both small and large format stores have a ton of content to cover - personally, I would make these two main headings, discarding the main heading "types," which unites them.

Literary Realism Major edits #1

Notes: The opening statements before major headings sparsely mentions the topic, specifically, but more umbrella terms associated with it, followed by extremely narrow examples. It is rather confusing to read. The subheadings under "background" are rather confusing. I think perhaps renaming background as "development" or something along those lines, and then *briefly* discussing realism's path of making its way into literature would be beneficial. The subtitiles "___ realism" with no specification to literature or a heading prior indicating the discussion of subtypes is rather confusing. There is a paragraph here that is also like 5X larger than the others. so re-working this content is crucial. Also, the discussion of criticism would best occur at the end of the article.

Major edits #2

Notes: Content prior to the "novel sections" really do not pertain to literature. The initial bulk of the article is discussing a more umbrella term of realism, including that of philosophy and art. While this is good for people who may want to learn more about it's development, I think having a more upfront discussion of realism in literature would benefit readers. The "social realism" and "socialist realism" sections appear somewhat irrelevant, but may be re-worked to fix that. These sections also have minimal citations and appear to voice subjective ideas.

Global Warming Pollution Reduction Act of 2007

Major edits #1 & 2

Notes: the audience for this article most likely consists of individuals wanting to obtain surface-level information regarding the act. Perhaps scholars looking for potential sources, but the content is very general. As of now, to understand the article, one would need some knowledge of the process/jargon associated with passing a law. Edits needed are less of formatting (unlike that of my previous article), but more so in copyediting/sentence structure/tense-correction/cohesion. The bibliography looks fairly complete and there aren't any blogs. I think focusing on enhancing readability is crucial for this one. There are also some serious stylistic issues. The final two sections "final statement" and "importance of government involvement' need to be removed entirely, as they convey the author's opinion in an essay-like manner (esp. since that this is intended to be encyclopedic). With that, the citation #15 should be removed along with it's content in the final section. Eventually, more content from someone who is more familiar with the subject would be beneficial. Also, The second paragraph discussing another act has no citation and minimal relevance. The "emissions standards" heading is also now "current emissions standards." Added citations fro congress.gov for chart and listing. Removed "limits" section from chart. (JK I misinterpreted what "limits" meant - I thought it was like limitations/objective, but it meant limits imposed in the bill on emissions)