User:Hankhankwch/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Caroline Lexow Babcock
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * I have chosen this article to evaluate because it's related to the class I am taking and this article explains who this woman was and why she was famous.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * The Lead is concise with who it is.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, the article explained who the woman was and what she had done in the past to protect women's right.
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * I believe the article content is up-to-date because it was mentioned that the article was created and improved by Women in Red project in 2019.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Yes, the article was just a introduction of a person.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The article is neutral without significant biased.
 * Are there viewpoints that are over represented, or underrepresented?
 * It should give a little more detail on what specific event she had done in the past to change the society.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No, the article is overall giving the information about a person

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes, mostly there are different references to different website and book or articles that cited in the references section.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes, some of the sources are listed with the date.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes, the links are either to another wiki page or cited articles.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes, the author wrote the detail concisely and making the article easy to read.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No, all the sentences and language structure are clear and understandable.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes, the sections are well separated with big, bold title.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * There was only one image of Caroline Lexow Babcock.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * There weren't captions for that particular image
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Yes, it did provide with the source where this image was from
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * Yes, the size of image is totally good size with great resolution.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There is not any discussion about representing this topic.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * This article is rated C-class in Biography, Low-importance in Women's History. The article is part of WikiProjects under Biography, Women's History, and United States.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * Nothing about discussion.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * Overall status of the article are still up-to-date with the information.
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * The strengths of the article are to let more people know about who Caroline Lexow Babcock was and what she had done in term of women's right in the past.
 * How can the article be improved?
 * Maybe provide some more detail about the movements.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
 * I would say the article is well-developed in the beginning, but maybe the author could add more detail. The article seems lack of something.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: