User:Hanmarnel11/Misinformation/Emsteacher Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(hanmarnel11)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Hanmarnel11/Misinformation
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Misinformation

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

Does the lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes

Does the lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No

Does the lead include information that is not present in the article? No

Is the lead concise or is it overly detailed? ''Not exactly; the insertion of "Rumors" in the second sentence is a little bit of an outlier. It would seem that by making this the second sentence the topic should be called "Misinformation vs. Rumors". I wouldn't automatically think of rumors as synonymous with or in contrast to misinformation.''

Organization and writing quality

Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Mostly.

Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? Note for "hang onto" - slangy and imprecise