User:Hannah lieb/sandbox

Article Evaluation:

I read the article titled "Poor Relief." The first thing I noticed is that it's actually about the history of poor relief and I think that the word "history" should be in the title. This article goes through different eras in history and how different societies dealt with poverty. There is some information that have "citation needed" next to it or in the middle of the sentence and I found this very distracting and it makes it seem unprofessional. This article only looks at poverty from the English and British standpoints which leaves out entire populations and information, so that is something that could potentially be added as well as make the article more worldwide and neutral. The pictures that go along with the article are all of old paintings that have very little to do with the actual impoverished and I think that could be improved as well. Other than only including British and English populations, I think the article is very neutral and matter-of-fact about the information. I checked citation number 11 and did not see that the journal cited mentioned the information in this article. Therefore the citation did not backup the claim. I also noticed citation #2 came from a blog and not a reliable source. On the talk page, the article is rated as C-class and of low importance. I did not see any conversations going on other than mentioning of typos and questioning information. ~

View Allison Erisey's sandbox for Team 3 topic ideas.