User:Hannahb37/Pinacocyte/Biolife11 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Hannahb37
 * User:Hannahb37/Pinacocyte

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?- yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? concise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes it is
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes with newer sources with it.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? There is not content missing from the added by for the overall article, yes.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * The content that was added is neutral.
 * No there is no claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position.
 * No there is no any viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented, it focus on the topic on hand.
 * No attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * The source seem to be reliable source of peer reviewed.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * The new content is well written and with proper grammar.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * The new content is well organized.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * The content added improved the overall quality of the article, it give a fuller undserstanding of the concept at hand.
 * The strengths of the content added is that is dives deeper in to what the content is about and allow for reader to learn more.
 * The content added can be improved by adding hyperlink to words may not be so know like porifera, to allow the read to discover that also.