User:Hannahbird96/sandbox

Article Evaluation
Vermeer

I found the information in the Vermeer article to be accurate, organized, and helpful. The facts were relevant to the artist, all the information seemed to date, and nothing was outstandish. Nothing seemed to be missing - although, I would have liked more information about his paintings. How and why they were created was briefly touched upon, and I think there is room for improvement. But, that can be found in other articles. The article was neutral and well written. There were no viewpoints that were overrepresented or underrepresented. The amount of citations and references was impressive - It seemed as though everything had a cite - and the references were from reliable sources.

After viewing the article, I moved to the talk page. There I found several conversations about the faults of certain sections. One, being the section focused on his family. And two, being the section where his art was briefly discussed. Some of the references were incorrect when speaking about the art pieces. And some facts were wrong, when speaking about the family. But, all the problems were resolved.