User:Hannahchaise/Schema (psychology)/Snqadri Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Hannahchaise


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Hannahchaise/Schema (psychology)


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Schema (psychology)

Evaluate the drafted changes
So far I don't have much feedback of substance to add, I think you've done a great job with your editing so far. Most if not all of the edits add a needed clarity to the original article. Your word choice seems very intentional and I can't seem to find any biases anywhere. I did check your citations and while the sources are great and the links all work (so the needed mechanics are there) the first reference from MIT might be a bit dated as it's from 2013, and just barely fits within the typically recommended ten year gap with references. That's something I personally would look out for to err on the side of caution. Other than that, I think you're doing great so far, there's not a lot of substance that's been added but I see your edits with expanding on certain aspects in the future and I think they're right on point, because the current information there is a bit muddled. I don't think there's anything that reads as biased so far and I think the existing and added information is all relevant, so overall I think you're right on track.