User:Hannemurphy/The Book of the Unnamed Midwife/LarissaSanders Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing

Hannemurphy


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Draft:The Book of the Unnamed Midwife
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
I thought your article was very well written! I can tell that the sources you have are reputable and that you've used them to create a well-rounded foundation for your draft. I think your article would benefit from some headers and sub-headers just to make it clear which piece of writing belongs in each section. Maybe think of adding a detailed plot summary, a list of characters, a reception section, an award section, and an infobox that has a picture of the novel with some information about the publisher.

By looking at what you have so far it seems like the first paragraph of your article is the lead section, the second paragraph could be classified as its own setting section, the third paragraph could be expanded into a characters section, and the fourth, fifth, and sixth paragraphs could be in the themes section. I'm not sure if you were planning on doing this already but maybe this could be helpful when considering how to configure your final article. Other than that, I only found a couple of small typos that could be corrected.

Overall, I think what you have in your draft is really good; your tone and article is professional, easy to read, and concise. Great job!