User:Haoyu Cui/China Geological Survey/Kristen112211 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Haoyu Cui


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * China Geological Survey

Evaluate the drafted changes
Peer review China Geological Survey

Clarity

The lead section is clear and concise. It provides readers with a captivating brief introduction to the topic. The author could improve the lead section's clarity by outlining what will be explored in the article.

Structure:

The article is well organized, and relevant information is easily found. The information provided follows an appropriate flow. I would have offered additional content for the also see section to improve structure.

Neutrality

The authors kept a neutral tone throughout the article, and there are no claims that appear to be biased, nor do they attempt to persuade the audition toward one viewpoint. However, there is only one reference provided in order to provide multiple view points, I  would include information from a variety of sources.

Cover and balance:

Since the lead section does not provide an overview of the content, it is hard to judge where the author will include a variety of topics. In order to improve this aspect, I would include a variety of topics at equal lengths and provide relevant topics that capture different perspectives.

Sources and references.

The author only provides one reference. There should be a plethora of resources from ranging sources. It is imperative to provide information from various resources to ensure the article encapsulates diverse perspectives and topics. I would improve the reference section by including sources from peer-reviewed journals, governmental organizations and news outlets.