User:Happyboi2489/Statistical hypothesis testing/Ajp256 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Happyboi2489


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Statistical hypothesis testing

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead and general content of the article are very thorough.

The "Use and Importance" subsection could probably be made more clear as to why or how hypothesis testing is used often especially in social sciences, instead of having the list of examples that seem somewhat arbitrarily taken from one source.

The overall ordering of sections may be helpful, since the definitions of terms, common test statistics, and variations likely could all come before the examples.

The common test statistics section likely should have some brief description or summary of various test statistics, with more detailed explanation given by the linked article.

The history "Early Use" section seems sparse.

"Null hypothesis statistical significance testing" could likely be renamed to something more clearly about Neyman-Pearson testing.