User:Harharharley/Save the Boards/ThanosLLP Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Save the Boards


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Harharharley/Save_the_Boards?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

LEAD

I think that more background information to the rise of "Save The Boards" would be beneficial in contextualizing the efforts of the founders and why it is important, as you strive to do in the rest of the page. Additionally, I think that everything contains a good amount of detail and isn't over saturated. However, I believe that your page might benefit from additional references to why the boards went up in the first place, as a means to protect businesses, and took the form of art/ protest in the process.

Content

All the content of this article is up to date and relevant to the current status of the movement. I think that content that would be beneficial in adding is just more background, including links to other Wikipedia pages that explore the BlackLivesMatter movement more holistically. Including this, I believe will help contextualize the founding mission of the organization better. This page directly relates to addressing the equity gap within Wikipedia.

Tone and Balance

The content of this page appears to be natural, and without bias. No view points appear to be underrepresented.

Sources and References

The sources and references of the article appear to be correct and without plagiarism. I do especially appreciate the direct quotes from the founder. I think it adds an unparalleled level of authenticity to the narrative of the page. The sources all appear to all be current and up to date.

Organization

The organization of the page is neat and straight forward. I believe that it could possibly benefit from some of the subheadings to be retitled, but doesn't particularly need it. Spelling looks good over all.

New Article

I think that the article can improve in linking to other wiki pages. List of sources can be a bit more exhaustive, but I think that will come with the addition of more background information.

Overall

I think that is page is well done, but could benefit from additional information as it pertains to the movement. Along with this, linking the page to other pages will help drastically and increase sources to your bib. Overall, good work. I think it captures the organization very well.