User:Harnieri/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article Title:
 * California Celebrities Rights Act
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * yes it is.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * yes it is.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * yes it does.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * yes they are.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * I do not think that is applicable to this article.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too
 * it is at the start level and rated mid importance.
 * Sources
 * There are 13 sources. Some are statutes and some are law journals.

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Barry Bonds perjury case
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * yes it is.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * yes it is.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * yes it does.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * yes they are. A lot of credible journal but there may need to have more citations after some sentences.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * No it does not.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too
 * It is rated a high importance article but with a B score. People think the article is hard to read.
 * Sources
 * There are 48 sources.

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Music Modernization Act
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * yes it is.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * yes it is.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * No it does.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * yes they are but there needs to be a lot more citations.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * No it does not.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too
 * The importance level is not rated but it is a start level article.
 * Sources
 * There are 14 source. The sources seem to be from a lot of news articles or magazines.

Option 4

 * Article title
 * LGBT adoption
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * yes it is.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * yes it is.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * No it does but it seems like most do.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * yes they are but there needs to be a lot more citations. there are 182 citations.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * I think so. I think LGBT is an underrepresented population and subject, especially in adoption.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too
 * It is high importance but rated start class. There was at one point only arguments FOR adoption and not against, so this showed bias but it was fixed.
 * Sources
 * 182 sources. These sources come from a variety of different places. Some are scholars
 * 182 sources. These sources come from a variety of different places. Some are scholars

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Paternity law
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * yes it is.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * yes it is.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * yes, it seems that almost every sentence has a citation.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Yes they are from scholarly journals or articles.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * No I do not think so.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too
 * It is mid importance and rated start class.
 * Sources
 * 17 sources. The sources are from law reviews.