User:Harnieri/Opioid epidemic/Idelmund Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Haley Arnier / Harnieri


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Harnieri/Opioid_epidemic&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template&redirect=no
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Opioid epidemic

Lead
The lead (as to this section of the article) makes sense. By introducing the relevant law, I get an idea as a reader as to the information that is to come later in the text. This lead reflects important information in the text.

Content
The content is relevant to the topic and is current. The content presented appears to belong as it all relates to the treatment of the opioid crisis within the legal landscape. I think the author could add a comparison of how certain federal circuits have treated efforts in resolving the opioid crisis since she discusses the Third Circuit.

Tone and Balance
The information is presented in a neutral manner. It is not biased or argumentative. As for viewpoints, the author could discuss how other federal circuits have treated or viewed efforts in resolving the opioid crisis.

Sources and References
Each statement is supported by a reliable source that Wiki users can access. The sources cited are current and reflect available literature on the topic. The sources come from several reputable authors or institutions.

Organization
The content is concise and well-written. I do not spot any grammatical errors.

Overall Impressions
The content has improved the overall quality of the article by introducing the legal framework of the opioid crisis. The article is strong in its content, concise sentences, and sources used. The content can be improved by adding a comparison of the federal circuits (see "Content" section) so that the reader has a better idea of how different regions of the nation view or have responded to the opioid crisis.