User:Harold Philby/Scratchpad

Paradigm example from several papers including:
 * Kallmeyer, Laura and Frank Richter (2006). "Constraint-based Computational Semantics: A Comparison between LTAG and LRS". Pages 109–114 in Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammar and Related Formalisms, Sydney.
 * Two policemen spy on someone from every city $$\exist 2 p \exist x \forall y$$
 * Two policemen spy on someone from every city $$\exist 2 p \exist x \forall y$$
 * Two policemen spy on someone from every city $$\exist 2 p \exist x \forall y$$
 * Two policemen spy on someone from every city $$\exist 2 p \exist x \forall y$$
 * Two policemen spy on someone from every city $$\exist 2 p \exist x \forall y$$
 * Two policemen spy on someone from every city $$\exist 2 p \exist x \forall y \subset$$

John Beekman

 * Beekman, John, John C. Callow, and Michael F. Kopesec (1981). The Semantic Structure of Written Communication. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
 * Hefley, James C. (1969). Peril by Choice: the story of John and Elaine Beekman, Wycliffe Bible translators in Mexico. Zondervan.

D. Reidel

 * Šesták Z. and WR Peters (2002). "The Early History of Photosynthetica, Photosynthesis Research, and their Publishers". Photosynthetica 40(1): 1–11.

Linguistic typology and topicality

 * Givón, Talmy (1983). Topic Continuity in Discourse: a quantitative cross-language study. Typological Studies in Language 3. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
 * Abstract

Other

 * Carlson, Greg N. and Francis Jeffry Pelletier. The Generic Book.