User:Hartnett.hm/sandbox

Article Evaluation Dance and Health →Everything in the article os relevant to the article. It is broad enough where it covers most necessary subjects but specific enough where the reader can feel like they have a good grasp on the topic. There wasn't anything in particular that distracted me. →Yes, the article is neutral. There is no bias towards any position. The article mentions the benefits and risks of dancing on an individuals health. →The authors and editors are seem knowledgable on the effects of ballet and cultural dance on ones health. However, I think there should be more information on other types of dance such as commercial, modern and theater dance. →The links that I checked listed as references do work. These sources do support the claims made in the article. →Throughout the article there are footnotes that reference citations noted at the bottom of the article. As I looked further into the resources, most of them appear to be reliable but at the top of the article, wikipedia noted that some of the sources may not be reliable. The sources that I did look into were not biased and relayed the information without taking a position. →The article is apart of 3 WikiProjects: WikiProject Dance, WikiProject Medicine and WikiProject Health and Fitness. All three of the WikiProjects received a "C Class rating" with either mid or high importance. →Wikipedia discusses this topic in a more scholarly and knowledgable way than I thought it would based on the way we have talked about it in class and the reputation it has. I think overall the edits I want to make to this article including other types of injuries that dancers may experience as well as general grammatical edits and suggestions.