User:Hashoush12/New sandox

Group Roles:


 * 1) Time-keeper: John
 * 2) Note-taker: Leo
 * 3) Communications with Cathy: Caitlin
 * 4) etc.: Andrew:

I will spot the locations that have potential to be better. Great idea! Make sure you read the WikiEdu training document on spotting gaps. Cathygaborusf (talk) 00:44, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Make the sure we are kept in track with deadlines and their work

What needs to get done to improve your page?

Our group looked at two main areas in the wikipedia article, "Rogerian Critique" and "In-Practice. We also talked about rearranging a few paraphgs to make it more simple.

'''Who is going to do each thing? Could be one person, could be a pair, could be the whole group.'''

Me and John will be adding information about Carl Rogers and Updating the in practice section.

Caitlin and Leo will add information about Critiques and limitations/adding/potentially editing a new section.

'''How are you going to do it? BE VERY SPECIFIC'''

I plan to add more to step 4 in the in practice section about how empathy plays a big role to formulate a rogerian argument. I also plan to show the connection of how Carl Rogers' therapy connects to the Rogerian Argument.

When using these techniques, it’s important to understand it empathetically. In other words, to stand in their shoes and see the world from their vantage point.


 * 1) Start a Rogerian Argument explaining how the issue affects you and the opponent's position without any criticism or bias.
 * 2) Describe the opposing view with context. The goal of a Rogerian Argument is to reduce threats, which will pave the way for reasonable discussion. To do this, you must show that the opponent's position  is understood.
 * 3) Simply explain what reasons you have for choosing your side. Use common ideas and beliefs to persuade your reader to step in your viewpoint.
 * 4) Find common ground on what you and your opponent can negotiate on.

I'm confused about where you would propose adding this and what your citations are. Why/how is this better than what is there already? Cathygaborusf (talk) 00:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC) Add an example of Rogerian Argument???