User:Hattiehruza/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.) Sport communication

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

It relates to my course material while also being something I can relate to and engage with.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The beginning of this article was concise and insightful. Although it was a good start, the middle of the intro paragraph became a little too wordy and began to make me lose interest in the topic. Topics of sport communication that were well addressed were the opportune career paths.

Although this article was fairly written, the opportunities for more well cited sources could've been higher to broaden the landscape for this article. Communications in sports can affect more than just the primary people directly involved in a sport. It can affect the people in any path they cross.

I do not feel as though there was any unjust bias in the article as all of it was factual and for the majority was also cited. Like I had already mentioned, more reliable sources and in depth sources could have been added to create depth and intensity.

Only one image was used throughout the article so I believe it's safe to say a more outlined and intriguing article could be made with an array of pictures and added hyperlinks.